Changelog

Have something to say?

Tell Rated how they could make the product more useful to you.

"validatorCount" is number earning rewards on the first day of the "granularity"?

The "validatorCount" you return always gives the number of validators that did earn rewards on the first day of the "granularity" (e.g. "week/month"), correct? When doing some calculations for periods where the number changed during the week, this led to some confusion at first. https://api.rated.network/v1/eth/sets/SETID/proposals?fromDate=2024-06-03&toDate=2024-08-15&granularity=week&limit=100&offset=0 Internally, we are now resorting to an “"avg" number of reward- earning vals" if we are comparing different groups. Obviously this also has drawbacks like not being integer etc.

Freddy-from-Germany 8 days ago

2

🗣️ Forum

In Progress

Pier Two incorrectly showing Numic Validators

We note that Pier Two now has the Numic validators on your website.. (which are no longer active and we never ran) - because we care about out performance a lot, this is very undesirable as we never actually ran those validators. It's knocked us from 3rd validator of all time to no longer in top 10. Can we have those validators removed from our profile?

Seamus McNab 16 days ago

2

🐞 Bug Reports

Completed

API Error message

Hi, we have received this error message in updating our profile, how we can avoid it? It’s just an error on the pool name? "detail":[{"loc":["body","poolTag"],"msg":"The name of the pool must match exactly one of the names listed on the Explorer. If this is a pool we aren't currently tracking, please let us know.","type":"value_error"}]}

Andrea 22 days ago

6

🐞 Bug Reports

Wrong validator number for P2P.org x Ether.Fi

Hello everyone, Could you please assist with this? We have 2,400 validators in Ether.fi, but only 500 are showing up here. We’ve already posted them, but received a message stating that they are already indexed. I suspect they might be marked as SSV DVT, but that’s not an operator, and I believe some of these validators are the ones I tried to post. Thank you!

nikita.tumanov 29 days ago

4

🐞 Bug Reports

Completed

Method of blockspace distribution detection

Dear Rated team, I am a contributor to the NOM workstream of the Lido DAO and thus especially interested in your dashboards concerning our modules. In the overview of the Curated Module I noticed that you listed severals NOs who the explorer claimed had obtained blocks from unvetted Titan relay in the past 30 days. I was able to confirm this for all but one NO by comparing the slots in which the blocks had been proposed with the relay’s API. Normally such blocks stick out in our own Fees Monitoring Dashboard as being from slots of an “unknown relay”. What was unique for the NO in question, is, that unlike for the other NOs, for none of this NO’s unknown relay slots I could produce a query that was responded to by the proposer_payload_delivered endpoint of the Titan - or by any other of the APIs of widely known relays - making me fairly certain we are looking at locally built “vanilla blocks”. But then, where does the Titan relay blockspace you listed for the NO come from? We got in touch with them - Kiln - and were told that while they do not call the getHeader methode for Titan for blocks available on multiple and ultimately obtained by a different than Titan relay. They do, however, systematically send signatures to all relays, including Titan, to improve the propagation time. Some examples of such slots that then produce responses from several relays are: 9590392, 9589936, and 9589912 Is it possible that this approach is messing with your methode of collecting the blockspace distribution, listing the blockspace for all of the responding relays?

sssngth About 1 month ago

4

🗣️ Forum

Planned

Account for vote lagging when scoring validators on Solana

Some validators are known to vote lag on Solana, where they vote on forks a few slots behind the tip of the network to increase their voting credits, which directly impacts them and their staker's rewards. Timely vote credits should be activated at some point in 2024, which should account for these things. These validators are not meaningfully contributing to consensus, so giving them a high score does not seem in the spirit of the score.

Lucas B 4 months ago

1

🗣️ Forum

Completed

Empty rewards for a validator

Using https://api-docs.rated.network/rated-api/api-reference/v1-beta/ethereum/rewards Get validator rewards metrics API, I wasn't able to find rewards associate with a validator I was looking for. Parameters URL : /v1/eth/validators/0xaa160542c2b1b9dbf5e11ca044067526c6dfff65efba88ea483d49bdbe478ab7489f8b1a903ea22b6d30cfa57626ca9e/rewards?granularity=hour&fromDate=2023-04-01&toDate=2024-05-13 X-Rated-Network = mainnet Response : { "previous": null, "next": null, "pages": 0, "results": [] } I was expecting to see some consensus rewards for that period. Here's the data on beaconchain https://beaconcha.in/validator/aa160542c2b1b9dbf5e11ca044067526c6dfff65efba88ea483d49bdbe478ab7489f8b1a903ea22b6d30cfa57626ca9e

Jacob Marcil 4 months ago

2

🐞 Bug Reports

Completed

Invalid response for V1 (Beta) Get Validator metrics

The API return a HTTP 400 for a valid request for this API https://api-docs.rated.network/rated-api/api-reference/v1-beta/ethereum/rewards#validator-rewards. Parameters : URL : /v1/eth/validators/0x923285aabe7b6edd1aff2022f6089b7343c9d35bfea3e22792c4b43350153e7323cbbb15ce096e9f3c60b5bc55713a4d/rewards Headers : X-Rated-Network = mainnet Response (HTTP 400) [ { "loc": [ "sumExternallySourcedExecutionRewards" ], "msg": "value is not a valid float", "type": "type_error.float" } ] Same thing when using the validator id Parameters : URL : /v1/eth/validators/1025148/rewards Headers : X-Rated-Network = mainnet This shows the existence of this validator https://beaconcha.in/validator/923285aabe7b6edd1aff2022f6089b7343c9d35bfea3e22792c4b43350153e7323cbbb15ce096e9f3c60b5bc55713a4d It's also possible to get this validator using Rated API URL : /v1/eth/validators/0x923285aabe7b6edd1aff2022f6089b7343c9d35bfea3e22792c4b43350153e7323cbbb15ce096e9f3c60b5bc55713a4d Headers : X-Rated-Network = mainnet Response { "validatorIndex": 1025148, "validatorPubkey": "0x923285aabe7b6edd1aff2022f6089b7343c9d35bfea3e22792c4b43350153e7323cbbb15ce096e9f3c60b5bc55713a4d", "activationEpoch": 242547, "activationEligibilityEpoch": 242529, "exitEpoch": null, "withdrawableEpoch": null }

Jacob Marcil 4 months ago

1

🐞 Bug Reports

Completed

No API data for nodeOperator entities

Hey rated.network! The endpoint https://api.rated.network/v0/eth/operators does not return data for nodeOperator entity (and any window for them). I don't find any reports of incidents or changes in the API. The response received: { "page": { "from": null, "to": null, "size": 15, "granularity": null, "filterType": null }, "total": 0, "data": [], "next": null } At the same time, data on the rest of the entities (poolShare, depositAddress, withdrawalAddress) are ok. Thank you!

Artem Vyrodov 4 months ago

1

🐞 Bug Reports

Completed

Solo staker missed from the list

Hi. I am a solo staker and running an Ethereum full node at home using Dappnode. But, my address has not been included in the solo stakers list. This is my node: https://beaconcha.in/validator/b8b3b65ad488bddcf4e5d05196d5ac876a866f1d7899d506fa0cb657a1e6defb6ed84e16c57e5037b33f9d4c45defe86 Withdrawal address: 0x28CF6aff1C2434000bcBc0A5b7ddF1fF810D5Fd2 Deposit address: 0x0e4C1ea8E65D96153Efcf264a64DA0c8c3685a04 Many thanks!

theredarmy87 5 months ago

3

🐞 Bug Reports