Completed
Lido SDVT integration
Along with CSM integration within rated.network it would also be good to have Simple DVT metrics.
james.kempton 12 days ago
đĄ Feature Request
Completed
Lido SDVT integration
Along with CSM integration within rated.network it would also be good to have Simple DVT metrics.
james.kempton 12 days ago
đĄ Feature Request
Completed
Solana delegator APY%
Hi, I'm going through your docs, the Solana delegator APY page to be specific and I cannot find a clear answer if the delegatorApy field from the /v0/solana/validators/ /summary endpoint response includes the MEV APR or not? Based on the value and compared to other API providers it seems like it does not cause the value is lower compared to other providers? If it does not include it, is there any API of yours that provides JITO MEV APR for delegators? Thanks!
Michal Baranowski 18 days ago
API
đŖī¸ Forum
Completed
Solana delegator APY%
Hi, I'm going through your docs, the Solana delegator APY page to be specific and I cannot find a clear answer if the delegatorApy field from the /v0/solana/validators/ /summary endpoint response includes the MEV APR or not? Based on the value and compared to other API providers it seems like it does not cause the value is lower compared to other providers? If it does not include it, is there any API of yours that provides JITO MEV APR for delegators? Thanks!
Michal Baranowski 18 days ago
API
đŖī¸ Forum
Completed
"validatorCount" is number earning rewards on the first day of the "granularity"?
The "validatorCount" you return always gives the number of validators that did earn rewards on the first day of the "granularity" (e.g. "week/month"), correct? When doing some calculations for periods where the number changed during the week, this led to some confusion at first. https://api.rated.network/v1/eth/sets/SETID/proposals?fromDate=2024-06-03&toDate=2024-08-15&granularity=week&limit=100&offset=0 Internally, we are now resorting to an â"avg" number of reward- earning vals" if we are comparing different groups. Obviously this also has drawbacks like not being integer etc.
Freddy-from-Germany About 1 month ago
đŖī¸ Forum
Completed
"validatorCount" is number earning rewards on the first day of the "granularity"?
The "validatorCount" you return always gives the number of validators that did earn rewards on the first day of the "granularity" (e.g. "week/month"), correct? When doing some calculations for periods where the number changed during the week, this led to some confusion at first. https://api.rated.network/v1/eth/sets/SETID/proposals?fromDate=2024-06-03&toDate=2024-08-15&granularity=week&limit=100&offset=0 Internally, we are now resorting to an â"avg" number of reward- earning vals" if we are comparing different groups. Obviously this also has drawbacks like not being integer etc.
Freddy-from-Germany About 1 month ago
đŖī¸ Forum
In Progress
Ethereum leaderboard all-time
Hello, can you please check if Stakin2 is correctly shown on Top 10 - All time effectivenes. When I click on Stakin2 to the detail page it shows 97,8% Thanks Tomas Eminger
tomas.eminge About 1 month ago
đ Bug Reports
In Progress
Ethereum leaderboard all-time
Hello, can you please check if Stakin2 is correctly shown on Top 10 - All time effectivenes. When I click on Stakin2 to the detail page it shows 97,8% Thanks Tomas Eminger
tomas.eminge About 1 month ago
đ Bug Reports
Completed
CU/Billing cycle
when does monthly billing cycle begin and when do monthly CUs reset? Thanks
Dimiter Georgiev About 1 month ago
API
đĄ Feature Request
Completed
CU/Billing cycle
when does monthly billing cycle begin and when do monthly CUs reset? Thanks
Dimiter Georgiev About 1 month ago
API
đĄ Feature Request
In Progress
Pier Two incorrectly showing Numic Validators
We note that Pier Two now has the Numic validators on your website.. (which are no longer active and we never ran) - because we care about out performance a lot, this is very undesirable as we never actually ran those validators. It's knocked us from 3rd validator of all time to no longer in top 10. Can we have those validators removed from our profile?
Seamus McNab About 1 month ago
đ Bug Reports
In Progress
Pier Two incorrectly showing Numic Validators
We note that Pier Two now has the Numic validators on your website.. (which are no longer active and we never ran) - because we care about out performance a lot, this is very undesirable as we never actually ran those validators. It's knocked us from 3rd validator of all time to no longer in top 10. Can we have those validators removed from our profile?
Seamus McNab About 1 month ago
đ Bug Reports
Completed
API Error message
Hi, we have received this error message in updating our profile, how we can avoid it? Itâs just an error on the pool name? "detail":[{"loc":["body","poolTag"],"msg":"The name of the pool must match exactly one of the names listed on the Explorer. If this is a pool we aren't currently tracking, please let us know.","type":"value_error"}]}
Andrea About 2 months ago
đ Bug Reports
Completed
API Error message
Hi, we have received this error message in updating our profile, how we can avoid it? Itâs just an error on the pool name? "detail":[{"loc":["body","poolTag"],"msg":"The name of the pool must match exactly one of the names listed on the Explorer. If this is a pool we aren't currently tracking, please let us know.","type":"value_error"}]}
Andrea About 2 months ago
đ Bug Reports
Completed
Wrong validator number for P2P.org x Ether.Fi
Hello everyone, Could you please assist with this? We have 2,400 validators in Ether.fi, but only 500 are showing up here. Weâve already posted them, but received a message stating that they are already indexed. I suspect they might be marked as SSV DVT, but thatâs not an operator, and I believe some of these validators are the ones I tried to post. Thank you!
nikita.tumanov About 2 months ago
đ Bug Reports
Completed
Wrong validator number for P2P.org x Ether.Fi
Hello everyone, Could you please assist with this? We have 2,400 validators in Ether.fi, but only 500 are showing up here. Weâve already posted them, but received a message stating that they are already indexed. I suspect they might be marked as SSV DVT, but thatâs not an operator, and I believe some of these validators are the ones I tried to post. Thank you!
nikita.tumanov About 2 months ago
đ Bug Reports
Is there something like an average age of a set/operator that could be queried somehow?
In order to quantify/qualify the âall timeâ data range a bit, as currently it could be anything between 31 days and >3 yearsâĻ In more detail/visually it could be like a time series of active validators over time in a chart.
Freddy-from-Germany 2 months ago
Explorer
đĄ Feature Request
Is there something like an average age of a set/operator that could be queried somehow?
In order to quantify/qualify the âall timeâ data range a bit, as currently it could be anything between 31 days and >3 yearsâĻ In more detail/visually it could be like a time series of active validators over time in a chart.
Freddy-from-Germany 2 months ago
Explorer
đĄ Feature Request
Completed
Too many requests error
i get the "Too Many Requests" error when i try to call the API. Example: 'https://api.rated.network/v1/eth/entities/Liquid%20Collective/effectiveness?entityType=pool&fromDate=2024-07-01&toDate=2024-07-31&granularity=day&limit=100'.
Dimiter Georgiev 2 months ago
API
đ Bug Reports
Completed
Too many requests error
i get the "Too Many Requests" error when i try to call the API. Example: 'https://api.rated.network/v1/eth/entities/Liquid%20Collective/effectiveness?entityType=pool&fromDate=2024-07-01&toDate=2024-07-31&granularity=day&limit=100'.
Dimiter Georgiev 2 months ago
API
đ Bug Reports
Completed
Method of blockspace distribution detection
Dear Rated team, I am a contributor to the NOM workstream of the Lido DAO and thus especially interested in your dashboards concerning our modules. In the overview of the Curated Module I noticed that you listed severals NOs who the explorer claimed had obtained blocks from unvetted Titan relay in the past 30 days. I was able to confirm this for all but one NO by comparing the slots in which the blocks had been proposed with the relayâs API. Normally such blocks stick out in our own Fees Monitoring Dashboard as being from slots of an âunknown relayâ. What was unique for the NO in question, is, that unlike for the other NOs, for none of this NOâs unknown relay slots I could produce a query that was responded to by the proposer_payload_delivered endpoint of the Titan - or by any other of the APIs of widely known relays - making me fairly certain we are looking at locally built âvanilla blocksâ. But then, where does the Titan relay blockspace you listed for the NO come from? We got in touch with them - Kiln - and were told that while they do not call the getHeader methode for Titan for blocks available on multiple and ultimately obtained by a different than Titan relay. They do, however, systematically send signatures to all relays, including Titan, to improve the propagation time. Some examples of such slots that then produce responses from several relays are: 9590392, 9589936, and 9589912 Is it possible that this approach is messing with your methode of collecting the blockspace distribution, listing the blockspace for all of the responding relays?
sssngth 2 months ago
Explorer
đŖī¸ Forum
Completed
Method of blockspace distribution detection
Dear Rated team, I am a contributor to the NOM workstream of the Lido DAO and thus especially interested in your dashboards concerning our modules. In the overview of the Curated Module I noticed that you listed severals NOs who the explorer claimed had obtained blocks from unvetted Titan relay in the past 30 days. I was able to confirm this for all but one NO by comparing the slots in which the blocks had been proposed with the relayâs API. Normally such blocks stick out in our own Fees Monitoring Dashboard as being from slots of an âunknown relayâ. What was unique for the NO in question, is, that unlike for the other NOs, for none of this NOâs unknown relay slots I could produce a query that was responded to by the proposer_payload_delivered endpoint of the Titan - or by any other of the APIs of widely known relays - making me fairly certain we are looking at locally built âvanilla blocksâ. But then, where does the Titan relay blockspace you listed for the NO come from? We got in touch with them - Kiln - and were told that while they do not call the getHeader methode for Titan for blocks available on multiple and ultimately obtained by a different than Titan relay. They do, however, systematically send signatures to all relays, including Titan, to improve the propagation time. Some examples of such slots that then produce responses from several relays are: 9590392, 9589936, and 9589912 Is it possible that this approach is messing with your methode of collecting the blockspace distribution, listing the blockspace for all of the responding relays?
sssngth 2 months ago
Explorer
đŖī¸ Forum
Completed
Is it safe to self-report exited validators?
If I submit a validator key via https://api-docs.rated.network/rated-api/api-reference/v0/ethereum/self-report that has already exited, is it going to negatively affected its RAVER rating? Thanks
Adam 3 months ago
đŖī¸ Forum
Completed
Is it safe to self-report exited validators?
If I submit a validator key via https://api-docs.rated.network/rated-api/api-reference/v0/ethereum/self-report that has already exited, is it going to negatively affected its RAVER rating? Thanks
Adam 3 months ago
đŖī¸ Forum
Completed
I tried to create a new account, and received a verification email, but the link doesn't work at all.
I tried a few different email addresses, get the same error.
maixsw 3 months ago
đ Bug Reports
Completed
I tried to create a new account, and received a verification email, but the link doesn't work at all.
I tried a few different email addresses, get the same error.
maixsw 3 months ago
đ Bug Reports
Completed
Validator status is incorrect
Could you please check and verify the delegation amounts because these have not been updating accordingly.
raj 4 months ago
đ Bug Reports
Completed
Validator status is incorrect
Could you please check and verify the delegation amounts because these have not been updating accordingly.
raj 4 months ago
đ Bug Reports
Completed
Table sorting only sorts current page view
When I sort the Solana validator list for a specific column, e.g. Delegator APY, it only sorts the current view, not the whole list. This makes sorting useless, as I want to e.g. find the validator with the highest Delegator APY in the whole list, not just on the current page.
christian.ullbrich 5 months ago
đ Bug Reports
Completed
Table sorting only sorts current page view
When I sort the Solana validator list for a specific column, e.g. Delegator APY, it only sorts the current view, not the whole list. This makes sorting useless, as I want to e.g. find the validator with the highest Delegator APY in the whole list, not just on the current page.
christian.ullbrich 5 months ago
đ Bug Reports
Planned
Account for vote lagging when scoring validators on Solana
Some validators are known to vote lag on Solana, where they vote on forks a few slots behind the tip of the network to increase their voting credits, which directly impacts them and their staker's rewards. Timely vote credits should be activated at some point in 2024, which should account for these things. These validators are not meaningfully contributing to consensus, so giving them a high score does not seem in the spirit of the score.
Lucas B 5 months ago
Methodologies
đŖī¸ Forum
Planned
Account for vote lagging when scoring validators on Solana
Some validators are known to vote lag on Solana, where they vote on forks a few slots behind the tip of the network to increase their voting credits, which directly impacts them and their staker's rewards. Timely vote credits should be activated at some point in 2024, which should account for these things. These validators are not meaningfully contributing to consensus, so giving them a high score does not seem in the spirit of the score.
Lucas B 5 months ago
Methodologies
đŖī¸ Forum
Completed
Empty rewards for a validator
Using https://api-docs.rated.network/rated-api/api-reference/v1-beta/ethereum/rewards Get validator rewards metrics API, I wasn't able to find rewards associate with a validator I was looking for. Parameters URL : /v1/eth/validators/0xaa160542c2b1b9dbf5e11ca044067526c6dfff65efba88ea483d49bdbe478ab7489f8b1a903ea22b6d30cfa57626ca9e/rewards?granularity=hour&fromDate=2023-04-01&toDate=2024-05-13 X-Rated-Network = mainnet Response : { "previous": null, "next": null, "pages": 0, "results": [] } I was expecting to see some consensus rewards for that period. Here's the data on beaconchain https://beaconcha.in/validator/aa160542c2b1b9dbf5e11ca044067526c6dfff65efba88ea483d49bdbe478ab7489f8b1a903ea22b6d30cfa57626ca9e
Jacob Marcil 5 months ago
đ Bug Reports
Completed
Empty rewards for a validator
Using https://api-docs.rated.network/rated-api/api-reference/v1-beta/ethereum/rewards Get validator rewards metrics API, I wasn't able to find rewards associate with a validator I was looking for. Parameters URL : /v1/eth/validators/0xaa160542c2b1b9dbf5e11ca044067526c6dfff65efba88ea483d49bdbe478ab7489f8b1a903ea22b6d30cfa57626ca9e/rewards?granularity=hour&fromDate=2023-04-01&toDate=2024-05-13 X-Rated-Network = mainnet Response : { "previous": null, "next": null, "pages": 0, "results": [] } I was expecting to see some consensus rewards for that period. Here's the data on beaconchain https://beaconcha.in/validator/aa160542c2b1b9dbf5e11ca044067526c6dfff65efba88ea483d49bdbe478ab7489f8b1a903ea22b6d30cfa57626ca9e
Jacob Marcil 5 months ago
đ Bug Reports
Completed
Invalid response for V1 (Beta) Get Validator metrics
The API return a HTTP 400 for a valid request for this API https://api-docs.rated.network/rated-api/api-reference/v1-beta/ethereum/rewards#validator-rewards. Parameters : URL : /v1/eth/validators/0x923285aabe7b6edd1aff2022f6089b7343c9d35bfea3e22792c4b43350153e7323cbbb15ce096e9f3c60b5bc55713a4d/rewards Headers : X-Rated-Network = mainnet Response (HTTP 400) [ { "loc": [ "sumExternallySourcedExecutionRewards" ], "msg": "value is not a valid float", "type": "type_error.float" } ] Same thing when using the validator id Parameters : URL : /v1/eth/validators/1025148/rewards Headers : X-Rated-Network = mainnet This shows the existence of this validator https://beaconcha.in/validator/923285aabe7b6edd1aff2022f6089b7343c9d35bfea3e22792c4b43350153e7323cbbb15ce096e9f3c60b5bc55713a4d It's also possible to get this validator using Rated API URL : /v1/eth/validators/0x923285aabe7b6edd1aff2022f6089b7343c9d35bfea3e22792c4b43350153e7323cbbb15ce096e9f3c60b5bc55713a4d Headers : X-Rated-Network = mainnet Response { "validatorIndex": 1025148, "validatorPubkey": "0x923285aabe7b6edd1aff2022f6089b7343c9d35bfea3e22792c4b43350153e7323cbbb15ce096e9f3c60b5bc55713a4d", "activationEpoch": 242547, "activationEligibilityEpoch": 242529, "exitEpoch": null, "withdrawableEpoch": null }
Jacob Marcil 5 months ago
đ Bug Reports
Completed
Invalid response for V1 (Beta) Get Validator metrics
The API return a HTTP 400 for a valid request for this API https://api-docs.rated.network/rated-api/api-reference/v1-beta/ethereum/rewards#validator-rewards. Parameters : URL : /v1/eth/validators/0x923285aabe7b6edd1aff2022f6089b7343c9d35bfea3e22792c4b43350153e7323cbbb15ce096e9f3c60b5bc55713a4d/rewards Headers : X-Rated-Network = mainnet Response (HTTP 400) [ { "loc": [ "sumExternallySourcedExecutionRewards" ], "msg": "value is not a valid float", "type": "type_error.float" } ] Same thing when using the validator id Parameters : URL : /v1/eth/validators/1025148/rewards Headers : X-Rated-Network = mainnet This shows the existence of this validator https://beaconcha.in/validator/923285aabe7b6edd1aff2022f6089b7343c9d35bfea3e22792c4b43350153e7323cbbb15ce096e9f3c60b5bc55713a4d It's also possible to get this validator using Rated API URL : /v1/eth/validators/0x923285aabe7b6edd1aff2022f6089b7343c9d35bfea3e22792c4b43350153e7323cbbb15ce096e9f3c60b5bc55713a4d Headers : X-Rated-Network = mainnet Response { "validatorIndex": 1025148, "validatorPubkey": "0x923285aabe7b6edd1aff2022f6089b7343c9d35bfea3e22792c4b43350153e7323cbbb15ce096e9f3c60b5bc55713a4d", "activationEpoch": 242547, "activationEligibilityEpoch": 242529, "exitEpoch": null, "withdrawableEpoch": null }
Jacob Marcil 5 months ago
đ Bug Reports
Completed
Broken link to this forum on Rated Documentation
The link to this feeback page https://feedback.rated.network is has a typo in it on https://api-docs.rated.network/rated-api/api-reference/v1-beta. Current link address : httlps://feedback.rated.network
Jacob Marcil 5 months ago
đ Bug Reports
Completed
Broken link to this forum on Rated Documentation
The link to this feeback page https://feedback.rated.network is has a typo in it on https://api-docs.rated.network/rated-api/api-reference/v1-beta. Current link address : httlps://feedback.rated.network
Jacob Marcil 5 months ago
đ Bug Reports
Completed
No API data for nodeOperator entities
Hey rated.network! The endpoint https://api.rated.network/v0/eth/operators does not return data for nodeOperator entity (and any window for them). I don't find any reports of incidents or changes in the API. The response received: { "page": { "from": null, "to": null, "size": 15, "granularity": null, "filterType": null }, "total": 0, "data": [], "next": null } At the same time, data on the rest of the entities (poolShare, depositAddress, withdrawalAddress) are ok. Thank you!
Artem Vyrodov 5 months ago
API
đ Bug Reports
Completed
No API data for nodeOperator entities
Hey rated.network! The endpoint https://api.rated.network/v0/eth/operators does not return data for nodeOperator entity (and any window for them). I don't find any reports of incidents or changes in the API. The response received: { "page": { "from": null, "to": null, "size": 15, "granularity": null, "filterType": null }, "total": 0, "data": [], "next": null } At the same time, data on the rest of the entities (poolShare, depositAddress, withdrawalAddress) are ok. Thank you!
Artem Vyrodov 5 months ago
API
đ Bug Reports